The Church of Tell It Like It Is


The Rev. Dr. DK Gemini is a published writer and satirist working on her first inspirational guide to Metrospiritual living. She has spewed comedic proclamations across the nation at various comedy clubs in New York City, Seattle, San Francisco, and Fairfax. As a former California public school English teaching survivor, she hopes to raise literacy awareness and the balance in her bank account. Additionally, she has spread The Word of God, by singing back up for musical legends Chaka Khan, Teena Marie, Will.i.Am, John Legend, Brenda Lee Eager, Siedah GarrettWhitney Houston’s ex-husband Bobby Brownand Michael Jackson‘s spiritual advisor The Reverent June Gatlin. Her film credits include Vulgar and Chasing Amy with Ben Affleck.  At one point she lived behind the famous Laugh Factory in Hollywood, CA. She hopes to one day raise three little pigs like the famous nursery rhyme, and drinks way too much coffee in her free time.

Comments on: "About" (16)

  1. I love your “About” > My coffee is tasting extra-good this afternoon now that I am added as your new fb friend.

  2. Hey Darling! Stopping by to say: “Hey!” Making efforts to keep up with all that is good! Oh, a friend passed along a Video, yesterday. Less than 10-minutes in, and I’m already taking notes, so I had to pause the tape, when I can spend a devoted amount of time with it. However, our work is… seemingly endless, and so it is my desire to focus on the good. Some times I go “off,” but I am grateful for the reminders.

  3. Forgot to include the Video link. Here it is. I would not DARE Post this on “The Dummy Pages,” aka “Facebook.”

  4. Many Thanks to Bestillandknow3000 for the educational YouTube upload. Many Blessings. Amen 🙂

  5. Wow, I can’t believe I sent this out to you, also. What was I thinking? This was actually sent to me, by my best friend, who sent it to me BEFORE she’d watched it. I, in turn, sent it to (I guess, including you — & hopefully not too many others) a couple people, ALSO, prior to viewing it. Below are my comments regarding the Video, which I sent to another associate this morning… sort of apologizing, but also recognizing that there ARE NO MISTAKES, but STILL, kind of TRIPPING because BOTH me and my friend sent out this Video link prior to, ourselves, viewing it… 🙂 Whatever! Below is my “take” on it, now that I’ve ACTUALLY seen the darn thing!
    During the wee hours of this morning, I finished watching the Video.

    I realize that there are really “no mistakes or coincidences” in life, but the truth is that this Video was referred to me, and thinking that it was “a good one,” I forwarded the link to you prior to viewing it myself. Now, that I’ve watched it, I feel pretty certain that I would not have sent it to you if I had watched it, prior to. Here’s why.

    Overall I thought the film really sucked!

    The movie touched on some POWERFUL and SIGNIFICANT points!

    However, the filmmakers did not even come REMOTELY CLOSE to fully representing strong enough arguments or material to support the ideas presented.

    There were NUMEROUS, but one such important topic was the marriage of Yeshua (Jesus) and Mary Magdalene THIS is a documentary within itself!

    One could go on and on regarding the information that not only supports their marriage WHILE HE LIVED, but also proof continues indicating that they were SO CLOSE to the point of being TWIN FLAMES.

    And so, the significance of THEIR UNION, and that relationship is POWERFUL, to the point where THE ENTIRE DOCUMENTARY could have been centered around THEIR RELATIONSHIP, alone, and IT would have supported the film’s theories probably better ANYTHING ELSE that was touched upon in the movie.

    Also of note was the concept of the power inherent in the male sperm, and the importance of not wasting it, through excessive ejaculations. Wow! THAT is a friggin “mini-series” within its self!

    How in the heck could these folks simply drop that phrase, then try and rush by, without supporting the point with additional data and information to support the point? Friggin’ irresponsible teaching, man, I’ll tell ya!

    I could go on and on, but I am actually getting myself “work up,” so I’d better stop.

    Fact of the matter is: SEX is a REALLY BIG DEAL for people. If someone is going to challenge today’s practices of sex, then these persons HAD BETTER BE coming with some pretty POWERFUL documentations and arguments in support of their theories. Otherwise: “If the theories don’t fit, we must acquit!”

    NOBODY in modern society is trying to “give up their nut,” based on some weak-assed theories coming from people who do not even have the where-with-all to present the material in an intelligent and convincing format.

    “If the theory don’t fit, we must acquit!” [Do you see what happens, when you talk to me before I’ve had my morning coffee???]

    Touching upon an issue that is at the core of society, as we know it today, these filmmakers fail significantly: sporadically jumping from point to point; continually REPEATING the same statements over and over again; and dropping “catch phrases” related to sexuality including “tantra” and “kundalini,” without completely delving into ANY ONE OF THESE AREAS???

    While again, ANY ONE OF THOSE “catch phrases/subjects” COULD HAVE BEEN THE CENTRAL FOCUS of the documentary?

    Overall, the film is an extreme example of bad storytelling, and/or “teaching gone awry.” How can one truly inform regarding a matter if one fail’s to organize and include supportive material — especially with subjects as WEIGHTY and significant as BOTH God and sexuality?

    By the end of the film, I was left feeling REALLY disappointed. The movie starts out okay, but then they proceed, introducing the main theme of man’s sexuality in relationship to God, with point after point going “unsupported by convincing evidence.”

    By the end of the film, the filmmakers have digressed even further, randomly making powerful statements of truth, and touching upon SIGNIFICANT aspects of man’s sexuality, but not bothering to string the statements together into a cohesive stream of thought, or flow, that ultimately would have supported the viewer’s perception and receipt of the material.

    This is a severe case of bad, bad, BAD film making and story telling. Just plain bad.

  6. Many thanks to Bestillandknow3000 for expressing her criticism of the YouTube footage that was sent to me. Peace and Blessings.

  7. Rev. Dr. DK Gemini seems like a real pice of crap, oh yeah a funny pice of crap…LOL!!!!

  8. Oh no! Somebody from a seeming florida comcast account called me a “pice” (NOTE THE SPELLING. HA!) “of crap”. What a WINNER!


  9. Shes a Reverend of what, the book of satan? Al sharpton calls himself a rev too and is anything but! The filthy language and bs spread about innocent people you dont even know personally on your website? This is a disgusting website and not funny in the least. I see the liberal california shining thru for sure.

    • @ Johanna – please see definition of “SATIRE” below (see top right corner of blog- it says, “SATIRE”). Yes, RAPISTS and SEXUAL BATTERERS are DISGUSTING even when they ARE THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA, ENTERTAINERS, WANNA-BE-ROCKSTARS, and ALL OTHERS THAT RAPE and PRACTICE SEXUAL BATTERY and RAPE (see descriptions):

      What is Sexual Battery? (from

      Rape, sexual assault or criminal sexual penetration is sexual intercourse that is forced on another without the person’s consent or against the person’s will. A lesser form of this crime – referred to as sexual battery or criminal sexual contact – is sexual contact or touching that does not involve intercourse or sexual penetration but is still a criminal offense. (The term “sexual battery” refers to criminal sexual touching in some states, but to the more serious offense of rape or criminal sexual penetration in other states.)
      Rape, sexual assault or criminal sexual penetration is defined as sexual penetration or sodomy without consent. Sexual penetration is penetration of the vagina with a body part or an object and sodomy refers to oral sex – contact between the mouth and penis or female genitalia – or penetration of the anus with a body part of object.

      Sexual battery or criminal sexual contact is sexual conduct that does not involve penetration or sodomy, but does involve physical contact of a sexual nature without the other person’s consent. It often is defined as the touching of an intimate part of the body (clothed or unclothed, depending on the state) for the purpose of sexual arousal or pleasure, without the other person’s consent; or forcing another person to touch an intimate part of the offender’s body for the same purpose.

      In New York, it is illegal for an adult (someone 18 or older) to have sex with a minor (someone younger than 17), even if the sex is consensual. Those who break the law have committed statutory rape.
      Statutory rape laws are premised on the assumption that minors are incapable of giving informed consent to sexual activities. Their incapacity is written into the statute—hence the term, “statutory” rape. The age of consent can vary among states, and some states differentiate between consensual sex between minors who are close in age (for example, two teenagers of the same age), as opposed to sex between a minor and a much older adult.
      Though statutory rape does not require that the prosecutor prove an assault, it is still rape. Of course, rape that does involve force or an assault is illegal in New York and prosecuted as forcible rape. Assaults of a sexual nature may also be charged under the state’s assault and battery laws and child enticement and abuse laws.

      the use of humor, irony, exaggeration, or RIDICULE to EXPOSE and CRITICIZE people’s STUPIDITY or VICES, particularly in the context of CONTEMPORARY POLITICS and other topical ISSUES.

      Please have a blessed day.#MeToo (Literacy changes lives) Thanks for reading my blog! Peace.

      • JoHanna said:

        Is ur name geminitis or vaginitis? Just wondering.. u must feel really crappy about yourself to blast so many people on here. Maybe you should be sued for defamation of character. I don’t know why you have a blog. U have the most horrid and unfunny writing skills I’ve ever seen. Please get some mental help. Get over the past. Prayers for you “reverend”. LOL

      • @ JoHanna: aww…you poor thing. Was it rough when you were sucking your daddy’s penis? Must’ve been awful considering that you don’t even know what defamation of character is. Have a nice day idiot. I’ll keep prayin’ for ya’!

      • JoHanna said:

        Case in point with your response. Enough said. 🙂

  10. JoHanna said:

    Try a thing called google if you don’t know proper definitions. It really helps.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Tag Cloud

%d bloggers like this: